Snooker The Fine Art © Method
A secret is wasted if not shared
Dear Mr Flanker
How are you sir! I think your wrong about Ronnie O Sullivan. The lad is a bit of a rebel but still in love with the game.
Ronnie is struggling with the game and wondering why the entertainment value is missing from snooker generally and his own game in particular.
Ronnie has experienced that “Feeling” when the standing ovation for his game had nothing to do with “Victory” but the sheer entertainment value in the success.
The lad knows he could be a multi times champion like Steve and Hendry who were commercially driven and never considered the “Entertainment” value to television viewers.
The Roar of the Crucible crowds and praise from “we” snooker addicts is like a wonderful “Burial” each year filled with false promises.
Steve Davis and Stephen Hendry had an unfair advantage over Ronnie as they never had to entertain any one just grind out wins and often to empty seats.
The place is packed out every time Ronnie plays and the lad “Worries” that he may not give value for money as few opponents have ever played “Entertaining Snooker”.
Ronnie is searching for “The Reason” for a missed pot other than the platitudes and silly reasons like carelessness given by TV commenter.
Snooker is riddled with the 4 out of 5 syndrome. Many “Specific” shots that are missed one in five. Without this fault most frames would be a total clearance.
Snooker is further complicated by second and third class players that can make century and 147 breaks but cant explain to others (with words) what they are doing “Right” or doing “Wrong”. Daniel Marner@mrheyyoutwitterfacebookandyahoo
No comments:
Post a Comment