Tuesday, 15 January 2013

Snooker Scene discriminates and has repeatedly refused to sell advertising space to the "Fine Art" method probable because I am not English. There is no other logical reason for refusal? DM



Judd 15/01/13

Snooker The Fine Art © Method
ISBN 0 9517089 0 2
A secret is wasted if not shared

Dear Judd Trump
How are you lad! You are right about the decline of professional Snooker and as a game rivals only Snakes and Ladders and Ludo.

The fact that that the game has some multi million pound players still playing and still active in snooker not one millionaire has invested in snooker tournaments.

Snooker may never rival football and other big money sports but it could surpass the lucrative “Tobacco Period” of the 19-80s and nineties by harnessing the revenue from “Bandits” that coach copyright snooker without an annual permit.

Coaching bandits in the UK alone take over a million pounds out of the game each year simply by ignoring the Joe Davis copyright. Coaching can only be enforced legally with copyright status.

One “Snooker Coach” from each town in the UK paying a mere £100 for an annual permit would create a multi million pound “Coaching Industry” that could lease Copyright to all cue sports and countries worldwide.

Neither snooker nor any Cue Sport is copyright but the words and expressions used to coach to an advance standard have “Copyright Status” if original.

The Joe Davis library books on coaching are very limited and the reason for so many so called "Coaches". Snooker The Fine Art Method offers something new with copyright and "Legal Status".

The "Mechanics of the balls" and “Snooker Physics” covers cue sports worldwide. Daniel Marner@mrheyyoutwitterfacebookandyahoo

Snooker Scene discriminates and has repeatedly refused to sell advertising space to the "Fine Art" method probable because I am not English. There is no other logical  reason for refusal?  DM                       

No comments:

Post a Comment