Discussing Jim McMahon and Lee Doyle’s earnings in public (Snooker Scene) was wrong Clive and the act of an incorrigible and sad little man full of his own importance. Why don't we have the same exposes Jason Ferguson or the noble judge, or Nigel Mawer the regulator who decides what player gets endorsements. Blocked 15 Nov 10 by the BBC

Thursday, 21 March 2013

Blocked 15 Nov 10 by the BBC

Snooker © The Fine Art Method 

ISBN 09517089 0 2
A secret is wasted if not shared  

Dear BBC/606 and Clive 
Discussing Jim McMahon and Lee Doyle’s earnings in public (Snooker Scene) was wrong Clive and the act of an incorrigible and sad little man full of his own importance.
Why don't we have the same exposes Jason Ferguson or the noble judge, or Nigel Mawer the regulator who decides what player gets endorsements.

Clive Everton did NOT do wrong in law but took full advantage of the Freedom of Information Act to gain a possible advantage to friends on the then forth coming elections.
I hope that the BBC forum will allow “The Fine Art” copyright the same F. O. I Act the same exposé’s on Clive and Terry Griffiths’ past possible earnings.

Not having the exact figures with and without tax of Terry and Clive “The Fine Art” will naturally under estimate the financial haul they have both gained with Joe’s death. 

By the disappearance of the Joe Davis copyright Terry’s business increased by 72% first year and a steady 5% each year after plus a further 20% when selling off The Joe Davis diplomas to gullible young men from over seas. 

Clive’s business of selling disks and DVD on coaching increased 73% first year and steadied down to a steady 6% with the same coaching method being repeated from the Joe Davis books. 

The Fine Art reasoning that dear ole Clive was wrong is based on the fact. If it was lawful for Terry and Clive to monopolise the Joe Davis copyright every pro player should have been given the same opportunity not an “In house” decision.Daniel Marner@mrheyyoutwitterfacebookyahoo